Hey, everybody! Remember me? Yes, it’s been a while, hasn’t it?
For those who don’t know, I’ve been in the UK the past couple of weeks and I just returned a few days ago. I’m over the jet lag now (thanks for asking!) and thought I’d ease back in to the weekly newsletter with some random notes and observations from my travels. Also, for Corbett Report members, there’s a Subscriber Exclusive video with some more thoughts on my travel experience down below (you’ll have to be logged in to see it, though).
Enjoy!
To access this week’s edition of The Corbett Report Subscriber, please sign in and continue reading below.
Not a Corbett Report member yet? Sign up to BECOME A MEMBER of the website and read the full newsletter or CLICK HERE to access the editorial for free.
SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE VIDEO
Do You Have Legs? – Subscriber Exclusive #115 In this month’s subscriber exclusive video, James finally answers the question that is (apparently) on everybody’s mind: “Do you have legs?” Also, some thoughts on meeting people in person. Watch the video in the player above or download the file directly |
The Corbett Report Subscriber
|
vol 13 issue 16 (June 11, 2023)
|
by James Corbett PerspectiveThose who have seen Carol Reed’s classic 1949 film, The Third Man, will doubtless remember the scene where the film’s protagonist, Holly Martins (played by Joseph Cotten), encounters the film’s antagonist, Harry Lime (played by Orson Welles), on the Wiener Riesenrad. During the scene, Martins and Lime discuss Lime’s diabolical business scheme: stealing penicillin from post-war Vienna’s military hospitals, diluting it and selling it on the black market, leading to the death of countless infants. In one of the film’s most iconic moments, Lime opens the door of the Ferris wheel car as it approaches the top and invites Martins to look down at all the people scurrying around on the streets below. “Look down there,” Lime commands Martins. “Would you really feel any pity if one of those dots stopped moving forever? If I offered you £20,000 for every dot that stopped, would you really, old man, tell me to keep my money? Or would you calculate how many dots you could afford to spare? . . . Free of income tax, old man. Free of income tax! It’s the only way to save money nowadays.” From Lime’s perspective, the people down below are mere “dots” to be manipulated, maimed or even killed in the pursuit of wealth. The deaths of those poor souls he looks down on produce no pang of conscience. He assumes Martins (and, by extension, the audience) will see things the same way. Sadly, this line of thought, as blood-curdling as it is, is perfectly familiar to those who have studied the mindset of the elitist eugenicists, whose vast fortunes are made at the expense of us little “dots.” The scene on the Ferris wheel perfectly encapsulates the calculus that goes into the Rothschilds’ monetary manipulations and the Rockefeller-sponsored “Green” Revolution and the Gates-led Gene Revolution and all the other schemes by which the Powers That Shouldn’t Be make money and increase their might by crippling or killing those of us down below. The only thing missing from this incisive study of the operation of power in our society is the recognition that the Gateses and the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds and their ilk are, unlike the criminal fugitive Harry Lime, actually admired by the largely ignorant masses, lauded for their “philanthropy” and their business acumen even as they commit atrocities against humanity. Meanwhile, here in May of 2023, I sit in a 787 breaking through cloud cover at 5,000 feet as we make our final approach into London Heathrow. I see the houses, the buildings, the cars, the bustling of the people on the streets below. But, unlike Lime, I don’t see little dots who can be manipulated, crippled or killed in the pursuit of money or power. I see mothers and fathers on outings with their family, businessmen and women rushing to their jobs, trucks transporting goods from one place to another, shops and schools and homes and farms buzzing with activity. I see the outskirts of a vibrant city spread out beneath me, full of good things and bad things and everything in between things. I see the flourishing of humanity in all its fallible beauty. I see life. And I rejoice. It’s all a matter of perspective. Card OnlyA couple thousand years ago, the Romans completed their conquest of Britain, establishing the Roman province of Britannia. Discovering a natural hot spring in the valley of the River Avon, they promptly built a temple to Minerva (the Roman goddess of healing) next to the site and established a small urban settlement known as Aquae Sulis there. And, being Roman, they naturally decided to turn the hot spring into a public bath. Historians, archeologists and museum guides tell us that the temple was constructed somewhere around 60–70 AD and that the bathing area was gradually built up over the course of the next three hundred years. They also tell us that the site fell into disrepair in the 5th century and the original Roman baths were destroyed in the 6th century. . . but what do they know?) What they do know is that the original complex, now buried below street level, was excavated in 1870 and was gradually turned into the museum and visitor attraction that it is today. You can walk around the excavated site, learn about its history, and see various exhibits displaying the remnants of Aquae Sulis and its inhabitants. One exhibit I found particularly interesting was a display of some of the thousands of Roman coins that had been thrown into the “Sacred Spring,” presumably as an offering to the goddess. In fact, according to the World History Encyclopedia, the practice of throwing coins into the spring even predated the Romans. “The local tribes—the Dobunni and the Durotrigesis—threw the coins, styled with imagery of ships, human heads, and triple-tailed horses into the sacred spring as offerings to the [Celtic] goddess [Sulis].” So, to sum up: thousands of years ago, people travelled to the site of these springs to bathe in their healing waters and to throw coins in this spring as an offering to the gods. But if you go there today, you’ll see this: I got very used to seeing “CARD ONLY” and “CASHLESS” signs in businesses during my brief stint in England, but this sign at the Roman Baths had to take the crappy cashless cake. Oh, yes, there’s still a cash box for you Luddites out there, but the gods now prefer contactless payment, please. Indeed, wherever I went in my travels throughout the UK, the contactless payment device was always offered first and cash was only taken begrudgingly if I insisted on it. In a fair number of shops, cash was no longer even an option. I can’t say I’m surprised by this development, but it caused a bit of culture shock nonetheless. Look, I know the cashless dystopia is coming. Heck, I’ve written and warned about the coming cashless control grid over and over and over again. But from my perch here in Japan, it’s more of a threat that’s looming over the horizon than a present-day reality. Paper money is still good for any and every conceivable transaction in the land of the rising sun, right up to and including the purchase of cars. (I should know: that’s how we bought our vehicle!) While various payment apps are gradually becoming more widely adopted here, it’s scarcely conceivable that a public-facing, functioning business in Japan wouldn’t expect cash to be the default payment option. And the idea of not accepting cash at all? Thankfully, that’s not something I have had to worry about here yet. However, travelling in England has brought the problem into focus for me in a way that was not apparent before. There are situations where I can imagine it’s extremely difficult if not impossible for people in the UK to pay with cash. The idea of Cash Friday and the push to support cash-friendly businesses have thus become more important than ever. . . . I just wonder when the Bath Spa operators are going to discover the 10 yen coin that some nameless tourist threw into the spring in defiance of that bothersome sign. Meeting People is EasyYes, everyone knows that digital communication is not real communication. So much of the human element of conversation is utterly lost when we communicate with others through our keyboards instead of in face-to-face interaction. But then we promptly forget that distinction when we log in and start having online chats/rants/arguments with our internet “friends.” There’s no better cure for the cybernetic simulacrum of society, then, than gathering with real people. In an actual room. In real life. A radical idea these days, to be sure. Luckily, that was precisely what I was able to do in Bath earlier this month at the Better Way Conference. These conferences are always important places for attending talks, delivering presentations, connecting with other researchers and discussing news and events. But more important than all of that (for me at least) is that they present the chance to actually meet some of my audience in person. In fact, considering that I spend so much of my time talking to cameras and working online, all the human interaction at these types of events is a bit overwhelming at first, but soon becomes a real source of joy in and of itself. The opportunity to connect names with faces and getting to hear people’s personal experiences is incredible. Hearing how much your work has meant to someone while you’re locked in a firm handshake with them (or even receiving a hug from them) is worth 1,000 internet comments. Being able to not only answer people’s questions but to query them back and engage in actual dialogue is worth 1,000 hours of keyboard-enabled text exchanges. And being able to see someone’s expression? Hear their tone of voice? Pick up on their body language? It’s priceless. I know this may sound trivial, but I assure you it isn’t. And I fear that as we plunge further and further into the Media Matrix, we will gradually forget that this online chatting is just a poor, faded copy of genuine, authentic human communication. So if you find yourself spending more time with devices than with real people today, why not put down the phone, put aside the keyboard, and try meeting some friends face to face? I bet you they’ll appreciate it. The Least Important Story in the WorldOK, bear with me here. Apparently, there’s somebody named “Phillip Schofield.” And it seems he was a host of some kind of morning program in the UK. And he recently admitted that he had had an affair with some young staffer. And now his broadcasting career reportedly lies in ruins. Now, if you’re not from the UK you’re probably just shrugging your shoulders at these facts. Who cares? But if you are from the UK, you’ll know that the Schofield affair is the BIGGEST STORY IN THE ENTIRE WORLD right now. Or, at the very least, you’ll be aware that every mainstream media outlet is treating this story as if it were a groundbreaking scandal of such proportions that it threatens to alter the fabric of civilization itself. As you may or may not know, I tend to avoid lamestream media altogether except when researching a specific story or monitoring the latest propaganda. However, while in England (or “whilst” in England, as the Brits would say), I did pick up a few newspapers and turn on the evening news once or twice just to acquaint myself with the narratives that the British are being indoctrinated with. And, when I did so, I found nothing but wall-to-wall coverage about Phillip Whatshisface. So if you’re of the British persuasion, let me assure you: it is physically impossible for someone not from the UK to care any less about this completely irrelevant non-story, and it is utterly baffling to us outsiders why anyone would devote more than two seconds of thought to such nonsense. Having said that, my experience witnessing this tidbit of tabloid trivia being treated like a world-shaking news story of monumental proportions was a valuable one. We often get so caught up in the narratives within our cultural bubbles that we start to take for granted the pointless twaddle served up by the deceptive distractors of the dinosaur media. Of course everyone is talking about the latest celebrity scandal. Of course that’s “news.” What else could we possibly be talking about? Stepping outside whatever bubble we exist in, however, and seeing the hysteria surrounding some foreign event helps even the most hardened and cynical boycotters of the MSM (like myself) to keep the truly inconsequential chatter of the bought-and-paid-for presstitutes in perspective. So, the next time you’re in a foreign country, try it for yourself. Pick up a newspaper or two, flip on the TV in the hotel room (but only for a few minutes) and remember: the “news of the day” in your own country looks as absolutely stupid to foreigners as their “news” looks to you. |
Recommended Listening and Viewing
Recommended ReadingDigital ID in Canada and Japan You are being conned: Data, studies & UN IPCC all reveal Canadian fires not due to ‘climate change’ Recommended ListeningAre Libertarians Greedy and Delusional? Recommended ViewingBetter Way Conference on-demand streaming 8 conversations around topics of food, environment and health with speaker presentations and discussion panels (including yours truly) Just For Fun |
SUBSCRIBER DISCOUNTS
CLICK HERE to visit the New World Next Week shop and use the coupon code subscriber25 at checkout to receive a 25% discount on any Corbett Report DVD or USB (or the new Mass Media: A History online course) just for being a Corbett Report member! |
Funny how my first thought upon seeing your thumbnail next to Derrick Broze was hey, they’re the same height!
Curious about your thoughts on Karen Kingston’s reviews of patents and contracts involving the nanotechnology in the vaccines. Also saw that vaxxed individuals are casting unique Bluetooth signals, even while dead. Ref: “Final Days” documentary presented by Stew Peters.
If we ever had a chance in person, we’d be one of those to give you a firm handshake/hug in gratitude for your dedication to this work.
I have far too much experience with microelectronics and related topics.
In short: No.
You can not get bluetooth signals or such in your body without direct implants,
clearly visible to the eye.
Most pace-makers, watches, and phones have Bluetooth
Most smart-lamps. and phones have Bluetooth.
Most clothes (and many other products) have RIFD tags.
So it is likely that these people found those connections.
Longer answer: No
You can not make circuits, batteries and antennas that are not clearly visible.
Even with the best Ultraviolet tech.
Nor can you make something that turns into a working circuit. In videos
where they demonstrate such things they work with strong electrical or
strong magnetic fields to maneuver objects around.
It is exactly like having a magnet under your table to move a
screws on the surface. They also start sticking together.
It is not something new and you can not do much with it.
Magnets are not magic and not “nano tech”.
There is a lot of science fiction in popular science journals
pretending to be real. Like “smart dust” and such.
In reality those are just proposals, by people that have
no real technical background.
There is also no graphene-oxide in the vax. Because it looks black.
And even under ultraviolet it is not black, but gives off light due
to the chemicals (lipids? or antifreeze? or luciferace?).
The flakes in the serums that people spot under the microscope are
exactly like cholesterol crystals. And they likely are.
Cholesterol is a lipid, so other lipids might also give similar crystals.
The enormous sticky clots are caused by Vax-spike-proteins
https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/dr-mccullough-the-covid-vaccines
It may be very similar to how prions are caused.
So sadly, this nano-tech story by Stew and Karen look completely
inaccurate to me.
And fairly I think it is spread to distract from the already proven
toxicity of the injections. It is a perfect straw-man and red-herring.
Here is much more info:
https://thescienceanalyst.substack.com/p/how-non-ionizing-radiation-affects
A recent new discovered problem with the injections are
the presence of bacterial DNA inside the lipid nano capsules.
And it is likely that this DNA will embed itself in a cell and
stay there until the person dies.
https://doctors4covidethics.org/covid-19-mrna-vaccines-contain-excessive-quantities-of-bacterial-dna-evidence-and-implications/
https://doctors4covidethics.org/alternate-mechanisms-of-mrna-vaccine-toxicity-which-one-is-the-main-culprit/
I saw a Spanish documentary, where about 8 unjabbed people went to a graveyard, and they were picking up MAC signals from the dead.
There are many many systems that generate radio-waves today.
If you get a bluetooth address from a dead body it
is likely a pacemaker.
https://www.conehealth.com/services/heart-vascular-care/content-archive/a-bluetooth-enabled-pacemaker-provides-flexibility-to-patients/
There are also sugar-level measure devices for diabetics.
Maybe some hearing assistant devices.
But I suspect they have some smart lamps on the graveyard.
Most lamps on the street are now smart lamps.
And on a graveyard, I would suspect lamps with timers, so it
gets dark after visiting hours.
You need a directional antenna to see where it comes from.
Like a satellite dish.
How do they know it is from the dead?
You can get signals via all kinds of reflections.
I have seen so many people trying to do these things,
with no clue of technology.
They walk around with just a smart phone,
no SDR, no directional antenna,
no measuring from many different locations.
No understanding of bluetooth or wifi, or whatever device.
“There is a lot of science fiction in popular science journals
pretending to be real. Like “smart dust” and such.
In reality those are just proposals, by people that have
no real technical background.”
Ha, ha, ha, just like the science fiction in biology including virology, and guess what, prions. They are utter baloney, completely made up nonsense.
😉 You pulled technical rank on candm, thank you. Maybe you’ll thank me for pulling technical rank on you. I have far too much experience with molecular biology and related topics. 😉
I think there is a PR campaign for nanotechnology similar to the one for AI that is perhaps based on assumptions of how they believe it can work or will work that is speculative.
On the other hand, it’s probably a good idea to go to actual research and see what the capabilities are that can be verified and to see where it could be headed.
There are studies underway in cancer research to use nanotechnology for drug delivery and related therapy. Based on this study, it looks like research is being conducted with mice. This is for application in multiple myeloma a bone cancer:
https://mitchell-lab.seas.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/pnas.2215711120.pdf
My point is that, this tech is being studied and I’m sure psychopathic overlords want to use it for all kinds of evil. It could potentially have some good uses in medicine when other treatments have failed. It’s like any tool that can be used for good or evil.
But these tiny particles in my opinion could be very dangerous since there is so much not known about genetics and these particles may have unforseen side effects.
I suspect that one of the reasons for the mRNA and DNA jabs is to test this tech on the population and to also get people accustomed to accepting experimental drugs.
I’m sure they want to use these technologies for life extension and other technocratic endeavors and they need to know what the side effects are and the human population is viewed as an expendable test subject like mice.
Covid is the excuse to get people to take these weird drugs.
I can not believe that the most asked question is not “is corbetter report on facebook?”
Is it at least close second?
In regards to meeting real people: how real are the typical folk that can be met on such events? How representative are they of the common populace? I would say not at all and that is exactly the reason why many of use chose a certain degree of seclusion from the society at large.
Well, “chosen” or “forced into to prevent/delay going nuts” or whatever.
Of course there is not replacement for talking to people in the real world and I can only how taxing it talking to a camera for thousands of hours. It’s just that there is a big difference depending on the segment of the population you are talking to.
Had you visited Tory or Labor or whatever party rally, the first thing you would be doing upon reaching the safe port of your home would be kissing the camera.
mikey: After the Covid Cult Lockdown, Mask, Jab, Distancing, Curfew, and insanity here in our town in Sonoma County, California; I am very careful about who I talk to in person. I’m even less likely to talk on the phone.
I no longer trust people in our town of 11K. It’s like living in a mental institution with good weather.
I feel you. I suffer from trust issues toward my fellow human beings too since 2020.
However, an issue that I have recently detected in my own thinking, is that I tend to focus too much on the bad guys. I think it is a common psychological knowledge that we usually are very quick with blame but rather slow with praise. I do not mean to ignore the bad but to shift the weight more to the other side. Focussing on the villains too much at the expense of praise for the good comes with several problems attached. For one thing, it slowly frustrates and poisons ones mind. It makes one gradually become a misanthrope. This cannot be a good thing. For another, it is also providing the bad guys with lot of attention and publicity which often is exactly what they want and what they like. It is as if they are being rewarded for their unwanted behaviour. It occurred to me that that this is simply the wrong way around. I should give much more attention and publicity to the good guys (of which there is not only many, but hugely more than of the others). Problem is, often the good guys do not seek attention at all. They consist of the silent and unseen majority. Still they should be forced more into the spotlight as they arguably would make much better role models than the villains for everyone and perhaps it would bring humankind to take on a more positive stance towards culture overall.
Just a thought.
How do you differentiate between a good and a bad guy? If the vast majority were indeed “good, how do we find ourselves in this predicament?
differentiate: There is of course shades of gray. Other than that, it is not that hard is it?
predicament: Counterquestion: Why do we find ourselves in the situation that a vast minority has all the power and money?
The predicament we are in is because (a.) while having largely good intentions, the vast majority is weak and easily manipulated (Milgram!) and (b.) because of its weakness the vast majority is enslaved by the power of the few.
You haven’t answered the first question.
By “predicament” I referred to (without giving any strong indication but hinted to by your usage of terms good & bad) the lack of morality and fabric that is supppsed to hold people together and the resulting omnipresence of evil.
Money does not exist in nature, it’s purposefuly conjured up into existance by unchecked powers.
What does have an immediate effect in the real world (often as a consequence of blind belief in dogmas such as money)? Action, what people do and say.
What would be evil? Actions od “bad” people. Therefore, actions of “good” peple should be right and not result in evil.
As you have hinted in your reply, there is a lot of people with “good” intentions, but these intentions do not eventuate in right action. If this wasn’t generally true, we would not see so much evil in our world. And there is a whole lot of evil anywhere you look.
Who would exactly these “good” people be? Those that do not fall under the Good category, where exactly do they fit?
What is not good can only be bad. I do not see shades of gray, but we have to allow for work being in progress.
in reply to mkey: Existence, a thorny concept. Your thinking is excessively categorical.
Similar to money, what people say does ‘not exist’ in nature (if we do not count vibrating air).
In my book, good intentions count for something. If you do not allow for shades, there will not be any good or bad people left.
Because in black&white land, I am neither good nor bad. Are you? In the real world, there are shades.
“How do you differentiate between a good and a bad guy?”
If you still do not understand how what I said answers this question, I guess we will not be able to communicate successfully.
Your thinking is confused. Does the concept of money exist on the macro plane in nature or does it not exist on the macro plane in nature? Hopefully this is an easier question than the one about good and bad.
What is driving the concept of money and perpetuating its relevance by falsely attributing it value by drawing invalid connections to what has intrinsic value?
Good intentions do count for something. Perpetuation of evil, that’s the whole point. People considering themselves “good” while outputting evil and justifying their evil action by telling themselves fairy tales about good intentions. When it comes to the real macro world we live in, you tell me, which has more weight: the intention or the action?
Is there anything to your definition of “good people” but having “good intentions”?
in reply to mkey: I speak of good and bad. You assume the categorical existence of good and bad. Therefore questions are posed wrongly. One cannot pose questions premising a certain system of thought which do not allow for answers outside of said system. Answers would all be wrong.
Speech of action and inaction, of existence and non-existence, good and bad. These academical categories have no importance. Important is what lies beyond these categories.
If you cannot transcend categories in your mind, there is no understanding between us. The result is confusion. Naturally, you consider me confused.
You are just derailing the topic, there is no need to do that. If you do not wish to reply, I assure you that I could not care less.
The question is very simple: can you name some properties of “good people” and compare those to properties of “bad people”?
You are using these terms so one would epxect you understand what you are using them for. No, I do not expect 100% accurate and definitive definition of anything.
To “define” means to provide more detail to increase understanding, not to reach 100% of knowing about any given subject.
That’s all there is to it. Since previously you immediately went to “good intentions” I kind of have an idea where that would be going. But maybe I’m wrong and that is also fine.
The prime way of misleading the weak is by presupposing the existence of categories. The victim then suffers from a tremendous narrowing of the mindscape. And it will even propagate this to others.
Do not expect answers. Maybe an example might help: During the Milgram experiment, the victim was presented with the dilemma to obey or to disobey the order to harm another. Two categories of action to choose from and both of them were very troubling for the victim. Naturally, thinking in categories, many obeyed the order.
The forced choice between the two actions was causing great psychological stress. If there was no psychological stress on the side of the victim, the dilemma would have dissolved and no harm would have been done. Therefore, ultimately, the victims thinking of the whole situation solely in terms of obedience and disobedience was causing the harm to others.
Again, do not expect answers. I did not hold out the prospect of any. If not simply based on confirmation bias, expecting answers is a form of obedience and belief in authority. The belief in the existence of answers, in fact, is just another categorical mistake.
OK, now I understand. You use words that, to you, have no meaning. Great.
I can see that I am outclassed* here. I bid you farewell, sir.
* not a category
“The forced choice between the two actions was causing great psychological stress. If there was no psychological stress on the side of the victim, the dilemma would have dissolved and no harm would have been done. Therefore, ultimately, the victims thinking of the whole situation solely in terms of obedience and disobedience was causing the harm to others.”
In the experiment, the subject was not forced. The order was essentially a request and the subject obeyed because they trusted the authority figure without thinking about the consequences.
To me force means that there will be a penalty for disobeying, usually a harsh one, such as being thrown in jail or even executed. This type of threat is used in the military. Like with the jab. Refusal could result in dishonorable discharge. Or another example, someone has a gun to their head and is told to do x,y, or z. That to me is force.
But say someone works as a “subordinate” in health care for example. A nurse usually follows the doctor’s orders but the order or treatment must make sense and in fact if the person carrying out the order causes harm to the patient could also face consequences.
So, in theory a person following an order has a duty to know what the consequences are before following through. The follower must know if the order makes sense and has a duty to disobey if the order is a bad one.
There have been times when a doctor has ordered a medicine for a patient and if it seemed unsafe to perform, I have said no. I have explained why. Had I just followed the order and there was a bad consequence not only could I face a potential law suit but also the moral consequence of harming someone.
An order from an authority figure should not be enough to “cause” someone to perform it. People don’t understand what leadership and “following” is. It is not supposed to be someone supplanting someones judgment.
This is not a competition but I am glad that you do understand. Meaning is an exceptionally interesting category. It is the class of all classes which contains itself. My words do have meaning, the meaning you give them, but what they point to does not (which makes them kind of meaningless no?). Meaning is not a part of what is but the great detractor from it. Meaning is overrated and important only to those concerned with knowledge, always looking outwards. Words of wisdom on the contrary never have meaning. Knowledge is all about maps, wisdom is about the unknowability of the territory. If wisdom is ones concern, one better learns to differ between these points of view. He better learns to look inwards, beyond the mere meaning of words.
Since wisdom is rarely taught in regular schools (and I wonder why that is…), in the end it all comes down to what I referred to at the beginning: The masses, weakened through life-long unwisdom, first taught to them and then further propagated by themselves, are gamed and exploited endlessly by those who are more cunning. It means that most people are not bad, let alone evil, but simply unwise. It makes them confused at best and, if frightened enough, ready to join wars, stick needles into others or electrocute them at worst. If you are looking for a more elaborate (and ultimately meaningless) description of what is, look up the name Korcybski, just to name one of the many possible sources who tried to debunk meaning, amongst other things.
The people in the milgrim experiment at the very least should have considered legal consequences to actually harming someone.
Had harm actually been caused to the other subject, the person carrying out the shock could have been arrested and charged with battery and even murder had the subject actually died.
But in my opinion, the moral consequences of living with actually hurting someone or killing them should be more compelling.
The fact that this was not considered is troubling.
In the real world during petty criminal endeavors, if someone is a driver in a robbery or assists in any way to harm another person do face penalties and sometimes very stiff penalties. This is common knowledge that most adults are aware of. I think the milgrim test subjects were in college and should have known this basic information.
This is why I thought that the subjects might have suspected that there was no actual harm happening to the other subject. But I don’t know if they knew or not.
I mean if someone actually believed that they were taking part in a murder by following along just based on a request, this is very shocking.
@EngineeredPhilosopher
I think I get the gist of what you are saying though about how the systems are manipulative and damaging to everyone living in them.
JC made this point about psychopathic systems that they are made in the image of the psychopath. This is a mitigating factor.
People are indoctrinated not really educated. It’s like the mouse utopia experiment on society as a whole. How much responsibility do people living in the system have?
Do we have responsibility to consider what we buy and how that potentially supports harming others? Like products made in sweat shops or that uses child labor or how about buying products that were tested on animals?
When I say tested, I mean experiments that caused suffering like putting painful chemicals in the eyes of bunnies. Once a person knows that, are they also morally culpable by purchasing these products? Are there karmic consequences?
How about paying taxes? Should be consider how the money is used?
I think there are shades of grey in these situations. For example if someone needs a medicine and it’s only offered by a certain company have little choice in the matter. But if there are options, does the person have an ethical duty to consider if the product they buy or use is ethically made?
If people stop considering the feelings and well being of other living things, they become hardened and cynical and lose something, a little bit of what makes them human. The ability to love and feel compassion and feel empathy are part of what it means to be human.
I think many children instinctively know empathy. They unlearn this in school and in society.
cu.h.j:
That is right, the subject was not physically forced to comply. Actually, that would be an interesting modification of the experiment. That would not have worked half as well I guess. Because a psychical force that compels one to obey the authority of the social group is much more subtle as well as primordial in kind. It has been mentioned by many an anthropologist that, according to their experience with tribal communities, the worst thing for a tribesman is the threat of being expelled from the community. Becoming an outcast of the tribe, while being a much more subtle force than a physical threat, for them is even worse than death.
>”An order from an authority figure should not be enough to “cause” someone to perform it. People don’t understand what leadership and “following” is. It is not supposed to be someone supplanting someones judgment.”
What does that mean, ‘is not supposed to..’? Reality looks different. When I was young, I was in the military (it is compulsory in our country and.. well… I was young). Still, many of us were disobedient often times. Not openly, but just enough in order not to be promoted. Because when promoted, one is forced to serve longer. This is why the ‘elites’ do not like conscripted militia that much. They are bad servants. They are much less likely to thoughtlessly obey orders from above than professional soldiers.
My fiancee is a teacher at school. It is not all bad in school. It comes down to the individual teacher. She does her best to be a role model of empathy. Alas, society at large does its best to contradict her.
EngineeredPhilosopher:
your question about: >”An order from an authority figure should not be enough to “cause” someone to perform it. People don’t understand what leadership and “following” is. It is not supposed to be someone supplanting someones judgment.”
What does that mean, ‘is not supposed to..’?
I suppose what I mean is that I think a leader (someone who is more skilled at something and is guiding an activity) should (in an ideal world) be someone who can actually be trusted and the followers (in that specific situation) should understand what effect an order has.
The military is different I think but in the US soldiers are supposed to follow the constitution and not engage in war crimes or other barbaric acts. I think they have a duty to question orders that are illegal as far as I know.
But soldiers are often very young, like sometimes 18 or 19. Some could join at 17 with permission from parents. My grandpa was a pilot in the airforce and there were things he did I could see affected him. He didn’t like the damage to bridges and trains because civilians were killed. He said he could hear the screams at night. Those were his orders and he followed them and later I’m sure he had regret. But he was 18. That is young.
In his situation, what could he do? Say no. He was dirt poor and had no viable option for getting out of poverty during the depression.
The milgrim experiment subjects were not really “forced” they felt compelled to comply to be viewed favorably by the authority figure.
And you are exactly right that that psychological need or want for belonging is strong.
War is never ideal. War is always a crime. You surely know the phrase “The first casualty of War is Truth”. It is no different with the constitution. The constitution is just the second casualty after truth. Have you read what the highly regarded ANZAC soldiers did in Afghanistan? Imagine that this is only the tip of the iceberg. With or without constitution, there is no morally acceptable war. None at all.
As to your grandpas means to financial stability: Saying ‘no’ is always an option. There is always an alternative to a morally questionable job. However, at the age of 18, ones lack of live experience most likely does not allow one to see this. I was not hard forced into the military either. There would have been alternatives for me too. However, since the army I served in, contrary to the US Army, does not engage in actual war, it was nearly impossible that I would ever encounter an order to kill or have to support others in actual killing during my time. And then there was still the option to disobey. In retrospect, I should not have joined anyway.
Killing civilians is murder. There is no excuse for that.
According to the law of life, our actions have always consequences. Your grandpa had to pay for his error. I think even people who totally lack conscience, due to some defect perhaps, suffer and pay for their deeds.
Broadly spoken, there are three kinds of people: (a.) People who want to rule and lead. (b.) People who want somebody to tell them what to do.
and (c.) People who neither want to lead nor follow.
Speaking of ideal worlds: In my ideal world, there are no (a.) and (b.) people and thus no leaders at all.
Once while walking through a park I noticed a crowd of people around a woman who was unusually dressed up. I looked closer and recognized her as one of the local tv ‘news’ presenters. Seeing her walking around in possession of 2 actual legs seemed very odd. Good lesson in the effectiveness of mental conditioning. What other perfectly normal things have I been conditioned not to expect, and what perversions do I accept as ‘normal’? Several come immediately to mind, such as being ruled by….who exactly? How many others do I not see?
Why did the Romans name their fountain after a Celtic deity: Sulis? Shouldn’t the town have been named Water of Minerva? I find the mixing of Latin and Celtic in the name odd.
palama: Celtic women are beautiful. That is why the Romans named the baths after Sulis.
@TimmyTaes ,
Being a yank I just couldn’t pass this up.
So were the boys
@generalbottlewasher: I suppose that living in the SF Bay Area has made me insensitive to gay jokes. All I see and hear on the news is gay, gay, lesbo, trannie, gay, lesbo, trannie… on and on and on.
It’s not even funny anymore, just lame.
My tolerance for sexual proclivities has reached about zero.
The news coverage, the jokes, the whole damned thing can go back into the closet and lock itself in.
@TimmyTeas, yes I see the error of my way. My satire was aimed at the Roman hedonism at that time. Their morals were found at the end of their swords.
I should have said sheep instead of boys.
Pardon moi’
Dr. Greer’s Groundbreaking National Press Club Event. Disclosure 2.0
Whistleblowers from the military about UFOs and secret military tech
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDY7t6HihCw
A bit like Disclosure 1.0 (September 2001)
Far more interesting than Pentagon’s released information
Beautiful words. It felt incredible to meet you.
My Dad and I went to Bath about 25 years ago on our walking tour of the Cotswolds (what a lovely area of England it is). We threw coins in the Baths back then. No problem. Bath is a lovely city.
We had a car and driver who was a young Englishman from London. He told us that he’d spent the past week driving Arab sheiks around. The sheiks wanted special lamb to eat all the time and plenty of high-end call girls.
Our driver was not impressed by the Arab Sheiks.
“They are buying up half of London.” He said. “They are arrogant.”
But we enjoyed the baths in Bath and the walking tour of the Cotswolds. Lovely countryside and small towns. Great people. Great orange stone architecture.
Glad to hear that you had a safe and productive trip to the UK, James. Not once, have I contemplated cancelling my subscription. Please keep up the good work, mate!
Sol..
On the contrary; When you take a break, it makes me want to do the opposite of unsubscribing and subscribe even harder!
I was thrilled to hear you answered one of my questions on that massive QFC 100. I don’t know about the rest of you guys, but I’m going to up the amount of my monthly subscription!!
I have a friend that I used to meet every day for some exercise, back in 17-19. After lockdown, she decided to start homeschooling her child (which yay good for her) who was friends with my child. I visited this friend last week, but our kids were no longer as on friendly terms because her child was uncomfortable with our presence and preferred his interactions on some messenger service that my kid doesn’t have. Her son sat next to her and stared at her until it just got a little too uncomfortable to stay. She later apologized, saying that they just don’t go anywhere aside from the grocery store anymore and her son doesn’t like leaving the house.
Just a little something to be aware of for homeschoolers. It’s easy to get isolated and acclimated to it.
That’s the danger of homeschooling: furthering your isolation.
Community schooling would probably be the best option.
My ex’s friend got organised with another bunch of mums (kids of different age but roughly all within 3-4 year range) and decided to rent a place in the local village and they take turns to teach a class of kids who, yes!, are of different age, and that’s why the older kids teach the younger ones and then they have class-wide activities, and separate ones for the youngest and oldest.
It takes a huge amount of effort to find like-minded people who are willing to test alternative ways of teaching and to trust what/how other mums would teach your child, but it can work.
And maybe it works because she lives in a village where this sense of community hasn’t been destroyed completely yet
The feeling of isolation and depression is due to sickness of the society. I am fully aware od this and there is still a toll to be payed. Children stand no chance.
I was also in London at the same time as James but didn’t go to the Better Way conference.
I returned to London after a few months hiatus and I also noticed the relentless encroachment of cards-only businesses.
In fact, I also noticed one other trend that has annoyed me.
It used to be a discretionary tip in cash at the restaurants, then moved to card payment and a discretionary tip in cash, then morphed into card payment and you can type a discretionary tip to the card reader, and now we are at the last stage where the tip has turned literally into a for-granted charge/extra tax (in fact the message is clear: it is not a discretionary tip, It is a “service charge”).
My reaction? I ask the waiter: please remove the service charge. Shock and horror on their faces. Some ask me why and my answer is always: I am the one who chooses when and how much to tip, not you.
I have first seen this in Italy about a decade ago. They called it “coperto” or loosly translated coverage.
It was a relatively small ammount per individual, about 1 of that centralised EU delusional debt note. My understanding was that waiters were not payed outside of these coperto charges.
Any tips were on top of that. The Italians were very firmly held by the balls back then. Many stations left till rock bottom.
Interesting anecdotes on “tips” becoming baked in the cake.
Thanks guys.
I had ordered some seeds online from a Texas Mom and Pop nursery.
At checkout, there was a prompt to tip the worker who prepared the order.
I tipped a small amount (and I had a small order).
That was a mistake.
My seed packets had the fewest milligrams of seed weights that I had ever purchased.
I’ll never reorder from that vendor.
While I am poor, I also value the blue collar hourly worker who strains at making a living. Done that, been there, many times. I like to tip the folks who normally do not see tips.
For example:
Sometimes, I get a “Taco Special” loading up for a 2 day supply. On occasions, I have tipped each and every member of the crew. Normally, these folks never see tips.
I had to get a new car battery recently. I knew the hourly retail clerk really didn’t want to install it, but he did because I asked him to. I tipped the guy, and he glowed.
Anecdotal stories galore!
Our little Oil Capitol slipped in the cash bad,card good with the plandemic.
City policies are all developed by the Rockefeller Foundation,Harvard eggheads here. Elected City politburo constantly show a complete lack of understanding of the policies when grilled by citizens. They look to the expert standing just over their shoulder to ‘esplain it for me’
I Like the oxymoron here of no cash at any city service or venue but the city employees all have cash tip jars. One councilor said it was to stop theft by those great city employees.
That’s got to be a great way to stop germs from spreading around too. NUTS.
generalbottlewasher says:
“the city employees all have cash tip jars.”
I’m shocked…but I’m getting used to being shocked.
Dallas city employees can be reprimanded/terminated if they do not use the appropriate pronoun for other employees.
City facilities now have mandated trans-friendly restroom policies.
Some good news in Texas…
HB 2127
“Sue your local government officials”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/texas-passes-bill-stripping-authority-214341673.html
EXCERPTS
The bill would authorize “any person who has sustained an injury in fact, actual or treated” to sue cities and counties for passing ordinances in areas now officially under the domain of the state.
Winners of such suits would get damages and attorney’s fees covered.
Whenever cities pass big ordinances, “people get clever in their lawsuits to challenge anything they don’t like,” said Alter, the Austin councilor.
“And because the bill is so broad there are a lot of opportunities for people to poke holes in any bills the city passes.”
Trans facilities is just code word for “if I don’t have the biggest dick on the mensroom, I will sure have one in the ladiesroom”.
Mkey , you have a bizarre since of humor. You must have traveled I-40 and observed the truck stops and rest areas the length of this fine land.
The world is literally a stage now. Crassius would feel at home.
If only. My sense of humor was crafted in the theatre of apsurdity, also known as our everyday wordly existance.
Its predominant purpose is to keep suicidal tendencies at bay.
China is planting Fields of Stones stuck to Metal Bars – No, Really
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AynNsPs9i80
China is all about fake goals.
When I was a child we were frequently taken to the baths and made to drink some of the spring water from a fountain, and I’m sure I recall old men sitting in the bath – all for health purposes, of course they soon stopped that, made up some shit about the water being ‘dangerous’ starting charging outrageous admission and put up all sorts of barriers to ‘contain’ people.
It’s so depressing how England has been totally wrecked over the course of my lifetime, and subsumed by Yank culture. I’m in a constant state of grieving for the 70s – who’d have thought it? Jumping in a bath with candles during the power cuts as a kid was great fun – now people have a total meltdown at the thought of one.
Thanks JC for the news, I was hoping you’d give your take on how the land lies at home because all I can get out of my friends is the usual spin. As a nation we’re exceptionally easy to fire up with whatever distracting propaganda (I know, I myself was used in double page spreads of it)they feel like tossing our way but now it’s become an utter bloody joke.